After the instruction from Referee Bastone, into the , to address Rodriguez’s issues and supply him with an even more outlined explanation toward assertion from his mortgage loan modification application, Wells Fargo agreed to respond to Rodriguez’s demand. not, the plaintiff’s history page about your defendant’s modification software failed to conform to the new court’s directive (discover Wells Fargo Bank v Salyamov, 2012 WL 6729904, 2012 New york Misc LEXIS 5792 [Sup Ct, Richmond Cty, 2012]).

CPLR 3408 (a) demands a compulsory settlement meeting in just about any home-based foreclosures action during that plaintiff, employing servicer, together with offender should be negotiate in the good-faith to arrive a mutually certified solution, in addition to financing modification, when possible

Moreover, Rodriguez’s sign you to Wells Fargo inexplicably would not see him lower than both the Level step one and you can Level dos software, which the loan servicer should do according to the HAMP guidelines, stands unchallenged of the Wells Fargo. Continue reading →